Francisco de Goya

There have been times when those inclined towards artistic expression knew the pain of compromise, particularly if working with (and in) the media or on commercial commissions.

And you could make the argument that this is less true now than it ever was, and here are two reasons why:
Firstly, to know compromise you must be familiar with a technical and/or aesthetical (ethical or religious) high point – you must have strained to achieve some pinnacle of output and/or purpose (if there’s no high point, there’s no low point… and no compromised middle ground).
Secondly, and related to the above, the notion that a high point is attainable (or that there should even be a high point), in both technique and aspiration, has been cynically eroded and ‘art’ downgraded to mere currency, to be minted at will and whim by those who already are.
This is particularly true at the highest gallery level, where the Gimmickists and their ruling patrons ensure that the new big gimmick is always the next big thing, and each batch comes wrapped in pseudo art-speak and fronted by some long-necked friend to celebrity.

Goya – Self Portrait

In contrast to much contemporary market fodder and the sugar-tongued shit shovellers that shift it, there are numerous qualities underpinning Francisco de Goya’s best work and he strained until the last to command any technical discipline that might serve his purpose.

A Prison Scene

Although he undoubtedly knew the discomfort of having to offer up his brush to egos and blue bloods, Goya’s true legacy to the rest of us is not the work borne of compromise and money, but the work for which he chose the subject and—at the very least—rendered it as per his heart’s reasoned directives.

Pilgrimage to San Isidro

Goya’s Etchings

A print from one of my favourite Goya etchings was included in the Discovery of Spain exhibition in Edinburgh some years back.

Against the Common Good

Entitled ‘Against the Common Good’, it shows a legislative creature perched like a vulture, as if totting up accounts.

Although insignificant in size, this timeless barb speaks volumes about all gargoyles of self-interest and it could easily be adopted as a totem of our own bankrupt society: – one of the new – new (new) – Robber Barons, perhaps, counting profits from their latest batch of algorithmically-trained digislave labourers, who are themselves the unwitting building blocks for a Tower of Babel to ensure chaos.

Goya’s etchings fall into three prime collections or sets: Los Caprichos (The Caprices), ‘Los Desastres’ de la Guerra (Disasters of War) and Los Disparates (The Follies).
Manchester City Art Gallery has a good collection of Goya prints from each set and I hope they find a permanent post-COVID exhibition space for these manifestations of Goya’s piercing eye at the Mosley Street art gallery, because – in an artistic climate where self-indulgent mediocrity is rarely challenged – Goya’s work is the perfect vaccine.
Much has been written about Goya’s mind-boggling skill and invention. And even a layman’s understanding of how he mastered etching, and then burnished the subsequent aquatint process to tone his own cutting ends, leaves one sufficiently in awe of this visionary, and his uncompromising quest to master every method known to his art.

Los Caprichos

Los Caprichos is made up of 82 satirical prints. The caprices were a kind of pictorial critique, and, in the Diario de Madrid, Goya announced that he had ‘selected from amongst the innumerable foibles and follies to be found in any civilised society, and from the common prejudices and deceitful practices which custom, ignorance or self-interest have made usual...’.
Any civilised society indeed… especially those hurtling towards post-civilisation!

Goya had to tread more carefully than the similarly incisive Hogarth, who under English law had greater freedom to caricature recognisable individuals. But this restriction may have better equipped Goya’s caprices to withstand time, because the power-hungry Godoys of this world come and go, but the failings by which they rise and fall from grace – the essence of human folly rather than its fleeting personification behind a face – is/are very much our own.
Goya uses the ass in a number of Caprichos, as a symbol of human stupidity (a little unfair to the ass, methinks), and a personal favourite of mine is ‘Brabisimo’ (Bravo!), which portrays a monkey playing guitar for the art-patron ass, who nods like the appreciative donkey he is. Poetically, the guitar has no strings and could therefore be understood to be as naked as the modern emperor of art himself.
Another favourite is ‘Que pico de oro!’ (“What a golden beak!), which pitches open-mouthed, rotting humanity before a lecturing parrot.

Seemingly blind to their own condition, the audience is mesmerised by the well-spun words of the parroting parrot: – another timeless metaphor for well-schooled stupidity, shrink-wrapped in aphorisms and tweeted as wisdom.

Vanity, stupidity and superstition are recurring threads in the darkness, light and shade of Goya’s etchings, and human barbarity rears its gruesome head in the Disasters of War, which were wrought when the French invaded Spain in 1807, and throughout the ensuing war and famine.
In the set of 22 Los Disparates, Goya’s unfailing eye for life’s detail takes on more nightmarish qualities, and many people reared on Painter X and the fantasy art of the present would be staggered by the amount of work Goya put into dressing his dark visions.

The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters

The Naked Maja

My first meeting with Goya was on the bookshelves of the Library at the end of my Nan’s street, when I first set eyes on his Naked Maja.

The Naked Maja

That visit was with my ma when I was at Primary School, and it was many years before I learned the lady with the boobies had a title and an author.

Name or no name, the Naked Maja wasn’t for letting go and her naked fullness lured me back for many a sneaky peak whenever I was at Nan’s for tea:- in a bygone age I might’ve fallen foul of the Inquisition for such yearning.

The Black Paintings

My most significant encounter with Francisco de Goya also occurred at the Museo del Prado, in the room which houses the Black Paintings, when the buds of boyish curiosity had been uprated to a different type of euphoria.

Pilgrimage to San Isidro – detail

I wrote in my notebook at the time: ‘Want to see talent? Go and see Goya’s Black Paintings. If you are alive where it matters, there’s a good chance you’ll be touched permanently. Walking into that room was like coming home. Exhilaration.’
My notebook also reminds me that the euphoria was short lived.
‘But stand still and note the movement around you. Everyone moving, moving, moving. Looking, yet seeing not. The Human Condition.’

‘Reading.’ (or viewing the first tweet)

At one moment I felt privileged to be sharing a room with the efforts of the great Goya, and the next found fulfillment of his dark prophecy all around – the mood of great work is easily caught… but only if you share the same frequency.

Witches Sabbath

Converted to canvas in 1873, fifty years after Goya’s death, the Black Paintings were originally murals, painted onto the walls of Goya’s Madrid home, La Quinta del Sordo.

The Pilgrimage to San Isidro was given pride of place on one of the main downstairs walls, facing the similarly infected Witches Sabbath. The darkness Goya created would’ve surrounded him day and night, so this was no fleeting fancy.

A work of art is not something that needs to be learnt beforehand, and much of the joy of looking is in interpreting it for yourself. And whilst Goya ridiculed human stupidity to spectacular effect, he knew there were people in every strata of life for whom the grand illusion was not enough, and who were prepared to scratch beyond surface gloss for their answers.

Fortunately for those of us inclined to project, Goya’s Black Paintings are famously vague and their desolation can be imbued with meaning by the eye of any beholder.

Certainly a pessimistic view of humanity, The Pilgrimage to San Isidro may (or may not) have been a reflection on mechanical worship or the blind superstition than often follows.

Vewed from the present, however, the work could be seen as far-reaching prophecy fulfilled on a loop, as the snaking length of humanity is led off by any number or malign and cynical Pied Pipers.
Are the crowds queuing for a signed copy of Katie’s new (new) literary outpouring?
Or to the supermarket for some Ill-fluencers new face paint, guaranteed to make you shine until your pores prematurely give up the botox ghost?
Or perhaps they’ve read the learned and glowing reviews of Tracey or Damien’s latest – latest (latest) – culturally ground-breaking exhibition, in which art’s new nigh point has been set at ground zero, below-and-beyond the reach of those with mere heart, talent and acquired skill?
Or it could simply be a crush for the fastest 5G connection, as addicts jostle for their dose of lab-rat training, guaranteed to take your mind off your repetitive existence…until the next hour’s fix, which is guaranteed to take your mind off your repetitive existence (until you no longer have one).

Goya’s statement that ‘there are no rules in art’ was a swipe at the Spanish imposition of lines above form, not an abolition of skilful definition, and Goya’s need to be true was given life beyond fleeting fact by the power of the imagination.

And the general shape of the metaphor handed down from the walls of La Qunita del Sordo would appear to be clear and present: people are rarely so enslaved, endangered or threatening as when they fall mutely into step with the mob.
Pretty it ain’t.
Darkly prophetic it continues to be.
Art or the highest significance it is, was and always will be.

La Ultima Comunion de San Jose de Calasanz

Goya had little truck with the unholy marriage of worldly power, superstition and dubious spiritual authority which gave birth to the Inquisition.

Inquisition Tribunal

Nor did he genuflect his skills to the Sanhedrin of his day, preferring instead to expose and ridicule the worldly inclinations that lived in many a cassock. But anyone believing Goya was anti-Catholic should visit his quiet masterpiece La Ultima Comunion de San Jose de Calasanz (The Last Communion of Saint Joseph Calasanz).

The Last Communion of Saint Joseph Calasanz

With two of the most seeing eyes ever to shift lead or brush, Goya could tell a tree by it’s fruit, and in his Last Communion, the founder of the Pious Schools for the poor is dressed in the full glory of something beyond mere majesty.

There’s a story about Saint Anthony of Egypt, who, on stepping out from his hermitage, saw all the devil’s temptations thrown like an immense net over the earth.

My God, who can possibly be saved?’ he groaned in horror.

Humility‘, answered a voice from above.

For Humility is Eternity’s ‘clothing‘ for those who put their hearts within reach – it is the state of heart – and it is unavailable via any indulgence, PR schooling or act of will.

Christ on the Mount of Olives

As such, Humility would’ve made a better title for this picture, because it is this meeting of Grace and flawed brokenness that Goya captures so beautifully, and which to my eyes reaffirms the depth of Goya’s vision.

But beyond the innovative teaching and real-world curriculum of Calasanz’s Piarist order – including a rule forbidding them to be alone with children – there is a darker side, for children at the Naples branch of the Piarist schools were victims of ‘il vitio pessimi’ – the worst sin – perpetrated by the Headmaster and son of a powerful Papal lawyer, Stefano Cherubini (amongst pothers).

Like many a Cardinal and Bishop since, Calasanz – to his ‘great shame’- made the mistake of yielding to Cherubini’s threat to ‘destroy’ the order if the vile practices of which Calasanz had learned were exposed, and settled instead on getting him out of the classroom by promoting him to higher office.

Saint Peter Repentant

And for not dealing with the problem openly and at root, Calasanz was completely out-maneuvered by a well-connected, well-practiced schemer, and ended up getting locked out of his own schools.

And whilst taking on the powerful Cherubini clan by laying everything in the open may not have saved Calasanz’s Piarist order from Pope Innocent X’s vindictive axe, it would at least have set a historical precedent on transparency, as opposed to the cover-ups and ‘de-stabilizing secrecy’ that exposed a church hierarchy too-often focused on worldly power and good PR, at the expense of humbling Grace, which is the true power and lasting cure for sinners and fallen Saints alike.

‘Mournful Foreboding of What is to Come’
%d bloggers like this: